From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 05 20:28:38 2022 Received: (at 55283) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2022 00:28:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46762 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nmlpm-0004x7-C9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 20:28:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:59076) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nmlpk-0004ws-8J for 55283@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 20:28:36 -0400 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KvWdB5bkHzDqYY; Thu, 5 May 2022 17:28:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1651796910; bh=+1nB1hJ07C4BaMUFtrDmJEi5PIs6DjpVBBGl09vDnhA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EhpJsz3pXo6OOxJl85YtGap8koGIrCXErO8lmd/mkxQXWf8M391budMigclRjaDvV DyMUoqZPLnNBOig6+aU/8jSOKF0Ekg78UENFcFYIrS5ImdSWSYxAH0trW477JFke7G cVxtJzWa3RUTbV7LIptQZP2iLiFR7ciO+EmqbRm8= X-Riseup-User-ID: 330E6ADE7FA8FE51ABEF2523628BEA6B67912E24BB4381CFD788CAB990868193 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KvWd95kTXz5vr1; Thu, 5 May 2022 17:28:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 02:28:26 +0200 From: raingloom To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?= Subject: Re: bug#55283: =?UTF-8?B?4oCYdGVzdHMvZ3VpeC1zaGVsbC1leHBvcnQtbWFu?= =?UTF-8?B?aWZlc3Quc2jigJk=?= fails on aarch64-linux Message-ID: <20220506022826.5089eb2c@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <87ee1761ci.fsf@inria.fr> References: <87ee1761ci.fsf@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 55283 Cc: 55283@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Fri, 06 May 2022 00:50:21 +0200 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > The log goes like this: > ... > + guix shell --export-manifest gsl openblas gcc-toolchain --tune This seems to be the important part, it looks like the CPU arch isn't being detected. > Backtrace: > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1752:10 13 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) > In unknown file: > 12 (apply-smob/0 #) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 724:2 11 (call-with-prompt _ _ # default-prompt-handle=E2=80=A6>) In ice-9/eval.scm: > 619:8 10 (_ #(#(#))) > In guix/ui.scm: > 2230:7 9 (run-guix . _) > 2193:10 8 (run-guix-command _ . _) > In guix/scripts/shell.scm: > 160:17 7 (guix-shell . _) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1747:15 6 (with-exception-handler # > =E2=80=A6) In srfi/srfi-37.scm: > 201:16 5 (next-arg) > 113:18 4 (invoke-option-processor _ _ _ _ _) > In unknown file: > 3 (_ # # #) > 2 (_ # # #) > In guix/transformations.scm: > 864:25 1 (_ _ _ _ ((package ad-hoc-package "gcc-toolchain") (=E2=80= =A6) > =E2=80=A6)) In guix/cpu.scm: > 94:2 0 (cpu->gcc-architecture #f) This indicates the same to me. But I don't know the internals of --tune well enough, so it's just a hunch. > guix/cpu.scm:94:2: In procedure cpu->gcc-architecture: > In procedure struct-vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1 > (expecting struct): #f > + rm -r t-guix-manifest-12319 > FAIL tests/guix-shell-export-manifest.sh (exit status: 1) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >=20 > This is ca. 312879fddcf0713c0f1dafcc6faa089edbbb6e04. >=20 > Ludo=E2=80=99.