From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 12 16:18:25 2020 Received: (at 44559) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2020 21:18:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45786 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdJz7-0008Hm-GC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:18:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55168) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdJz6-0008HW-69 for 44559@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:18:24 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdJz0-0008U8-Uo; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:18:18 -0500 Received: from host-37-191-236-253.lynet.no ([37.191.236.253]:39570 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kdJz0-0004U6-DJ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:18:18 -0500 From: Marius Bakke To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Christopher Baines Subject: Re: bug#44559: gnutls 3.6.12 fails to build: FAIL: status-request-revoked In-Reply-To: <87v9eaffpa.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d00los2d.fsf@cbaines.net> <87v9eaffpa.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 22:18:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87zh3mb7fr.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44559 Cc: 44559@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > The question for us becomes how to ensure long-term reproducibility in > the presence of such bugs. > > In this case, I think the only solution would be to change the system > clock when one rebuilds GnuTLS (or to use =E2=80=98--without-tests=3Dgnut= ls=E2=80=99, but > you end up with different derivations, which is not necessarily > desirable). > > Thoughts? There is a related bug report here: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/39310 Perhaps we could make a "--with-system-clock" option for 'guix build' that instructs the daemon to fake the system time? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCgAtFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl+tppgPHG1hcml1c0Bn bnUub3JnAAoJEKKgbfKjOlT6SZUH/2JQce28Rehio2Dk1QbAXM2/8Peo8xhfOnA8 NYzJuUkjaqf8LNEs7uB/4zGsJ51IHznTqLecuqdjO+g6zEpzzNrdXmvVqv9A2Xcy GGa+ci5hUVKErrG+KGTQEiEtkRUjkzBKGZKv2jc4MpnXJgsDl0qidIZIOi/JmuC1 vtSTVM09dG8pj79MefTFKuJtRv0xEpXNRiaJNOjHO5jiThimoiKl15XtSgexPgU0 mzv9MV2Po3QRbhc/EE49P/oxuJqjmwFSPdCwL/0YlNEemr2bQx18ps6H9y9Hmg7W 5awKGRn0vAK5I45i0jyJyVWHk0a90lEIJSLwJF4Pul2CmpJsVm0= =g9FH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--