From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 09 09:14:41 2021 Received: (at 42148) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2021 13:14:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60778 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqy2a-0002Pn-R1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:14:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com ([209.85.221.49]:36831) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqy2W-0002PC-Aa for 42148@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:14:40 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id e11so15253742wrg.3 for <42148@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 06:14:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=qmSZcUTzqkIIUvYdn4K8LwGULvOSEmhL7JsfqePiDs8=; b=aL8fVKw2QpQfRsFgZ+CQt3xaH/+8LIahXY3YqV78pDoYbia3X62br9teuVRxp03TPz i63hnoE8K8dTIAt5wA9hPYPy0fRji+I1KxtCmuLQtY38HyFypNXj7XVAc6/GLAXQXc5m sWdkpWbZCKIm7GPzqZxjU1sP8Ab1Bv2GB1RdI1FtqQ1nOjhti336hZUlJ6GctWtnPRlQ n+M9yEIkm9jvp2Vwx9SkJrAU7CgcbqadLbXMY3fCbQQq8v+iQzVq0/7loE51cm5Avqus pKMg9zb1oa4ECbE4IwwTpYeQnmSYekfrSXvmDX3EF7YdoeUrNe2LEfm7YKOvQfHt/iL7 3ucg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=qmSZcUTzqkIIUvYdn4K8LwGULvOSEmhL7JsfqePiDs8=; b=PjlRbxG6QBKmbieWuarFbQbPZckrvjC+l0026OQaVmK8THZFMhdmt427z5zFTFpiu+ 20LdlBumCgGRrOPH4rBJunES7eljMgYEVcJu0qXATPnmWsM6VCTnqQ4/o1W4J7CQ3YRa mm5PwA2T7XuH8R5XeLnacEcZtJovrJxRiCO0EPC8NcIqYTmvoQFlNCtQVt9YSZccpbaT e6FphSsODqch9MngIzU4nAhQJpQPEvjq8QC/TCQUjI3vY45LSMiJRLQGbs5UWvoZmnLG /KSOLmjvgOQXhPi+9N5j4JfWaYK1LnkMCZV5IzTfaKxWPW6iOI59tyMuI+aXKPtbYiN5 IPLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Q2MSdPL93eY8mxEuS6rb6FpEX40qI50TSMw9pM7b+UVJ/7MbY R6UDUoLv96XSlPuHnX5QIdM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7erjZSsVQidg2pS0AIOysMtn2gbSRlb77bTRCkr2vRNALKGjcm6XPC2OlhP8W/6KFvpp5nw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:df86:: with SMTP id z6mr28375752wrl.255.1623244470315; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 06:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh02 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g10sm23577307wrq.12.2021.06.09.06.14.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Jun 2021 06:14:29 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: bug#42148: guix-1.1.0-13.26611f5 fails to build References: <87y2o3zp7n.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:07:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y2o3zp7n.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Wed, 01 Jul 2020 09:09:16 +0200") Message-ID: <8735wncp5t.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 at 09:09, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > There are two test failures on berlin during guix-1.1.0-13.26611f5 > tests. Log attached! Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.49 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42148 Cc: 42148@debbugs.gnu.org, janneke@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 at 09:09, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > There are two test failures on berlin during guix-1.1.0-13.26611f5 > tests. Log attached! Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.49 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Hi, On Wed, 01 Jul 2020 at 09:09, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > There are two test failures on berlin during guix-1.1.0-13.26611f5 > tests. Log attached! What is the status of this bug#42148? From my understanding, it could be closed. Right? Cheers, simon