From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 10 04:15:03 2020 Received: (at 28659) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 08:15:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35947 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGHjT-0006fQ-FO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 04:15:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40226) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGHjR-0006ef-A0 for 28659@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 04:15:02 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGHjL-0003Ks-BY; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 04:14:55 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=40204 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kGHjK-0004GM-7Q; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 04:14:55 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zimoun Subject: Re: bug#28659: Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash References: <87y2t7j54n.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeuy2mua.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnehe0zk.fsf@gnu.org> <878sl47t0q.fsf@gnu.org> <87eenbuim8.fsf_-_@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 25 Fructidor an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:14:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87eenbuim8.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Wed, 09 Sep 2020 16:31:27 +0200") Message-ID: <87363qjbez.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28659 Cc: 28659@debbugs.gnu.org, Jan Nieuwenhuizen X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, zimoun skribis: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> One thing I don=E2=80=99t quite like about the patch is the fact that = =E2=80=98guix >> substitutes=E2=80=99 connects to the daemon in =E2=80=98content-addresse= d-item?=E2=80=99. > > What is the status of this patch [1] following the recent discussion about > tar =E2=80=9Cdisarchive=E2=80=9D and SWH? > > Related: > - http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39575 > - http://issues.guix.gnu.org/42162 > - https://git.ngyro.com/disarchive/ Thanks for the reminder. I don=E2=80=99t think Timothy=E2=80=99s work chan= ges anything wrt. to this issue: it would still need to be addressed. Ludo=E2=80=99.