From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 13 19:00:16 2013 Received: (at 15284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2013 23:00:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34924 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VKcLW-0006Vn-Tf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:00:15 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:57332) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VKcLT-0006Up-Dp for 15284@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:00:12 -0400 Received: from fluss.localnet ([212.255.235.232]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZleQ-1Vf24p00Q2-00LYvO for <15284@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 01:00:05 +0200 From: Arne Babenhauserheide To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Subject: Re: bug#15284: wish: make the (name) field optional Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 01:00:03 +0200 Message-ID: <1942738.pvRsuMxUva@fluss> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.1 (Linux/3.8.13-gentoo; KDE/4.11.1; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <87k3iu2lye.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8761ueqq09.wl%arne_bab@web.de> <87k3iu2lye.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2666339.UzJ6piid3m"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:QX1SvpSMwlXL0MbXUeY8Q7FVeeY7EZcwkqVnVwG7Qu143pJzUP5 9RMKjO2GuamfGGZqEZS7kabAitYLVbedu7ULRkJ7uGFiwuScXgh6nJcXwgUEXUUOkNUY7DT k5nlXJ742LzF6rWIAcFSVSooFITLLOzOnJD0FpUsIrRvv8JYlq5pLGOzCli9OL7CfmiP2av 6SSWaTKHJlbNG7lcCiQyA== X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15284 Cc: 15284@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) --nextPart2666339.UzJ6piid3m Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am Freitag, 6. September 2013, 14:06:49 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > However, I prefer treating packages just like any other Scheme object= , > and to avoid introducing =E2=80=9Cmagic=E2=80=9D with macros like thi= s. I prefer not having to repeat stuff, and being able to do stuff like th= is is one of the big advantages of scheme. But to see whether it actually helps a lot, it would be necessary to kn= ow how many packages will be available in multiple versions (so the pac= kage name and the variable have to differ). Best wishes, Arne --=20 Ein Mann wird auf der Stra=C3=9Fe mit einem Messer bedroht.=20 Zwei Polizisten sind sofort da und halten ein Transparent davor.=20 =09"Illegale Szene. Niemand darf das sehen." Der Mann wird ausgeraubt, erstochen und verblutet,=20 denn die Polizisten haben beide H=C3=A4nde voll zu tun.=20 Willkommen in Deutschland. Zensur ist sch=C3=B6n.=20 ( http://draketo.de/stichwort/zensur ) --nextPart2666339.UzJ6piid3m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAAEIAAYFAlIzmPQACgkQ3M8NswvBBUhMGwP/S81/O5wiCgF1J7dCsamw41WP fQnHfiS5kTRKIAjXlkMjg3T8Sgzhkcg3HEmCToXdIyJgD/Lrt7wnYn5JsoFAc26l hoONj28NS1ZYXtN9u6BKWyXKFKns71vZmXQMlKay35HdQ9W17HVz1Geaxs7WUaRg zXzDSgSyV9EXQrV+gZA= =kBek -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2666339.UzJ6piid3m--